Skip Navigation, Sitemap

Local Berkshire

Published: Monday, 9th November, 2009 10:40am

Policing a new line in business

Profile by Alan Bunce

Comments (0) | Print | Email

A NEW line in business may open up in towns throughout the country if Darlington residents succeed with their private security patrols.

Security firms throughout the country should take a look at the comments on the Mail Online website where the words 'useless' and 'failing' consistently describe the police because they never turn up.

If people are prepared to pay £3.50 a week on top of what they pay in council tax for someone who will turn up, then there must be demand from householders who will pay for their own security. If they didn't turn up, people would get someone in who did.

If this happened in other places the effect could be positive for the economy. Householders want security and unemployed people want jobs.

The Darlington security guard seems to be a respectable former boxer but how many clampers could be put to better use this way? There might even be an effect on insurance premiums.

There are other advantages too. Police seem to have developed a nasty habit of arresting victims who complain too much. A private security guard is unlikely to arrest his customers.

Twenty years ago private policing seemed absurd but now the world has become absurd and private policing looks like a better alternative to non-existant policing.

  • About Alan Bunce
  • Business Editor Alan Bunce gives us his views on everything business related throughout Berkshire and beyond.

Posts by Date

« November 2009 »
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
89 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 1718 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30  

Have your say. Post a comment on this article.

  • Susie
    Unregistered User
    Nov 9 09 15:06
    Comment: 6230

    I don't know - I don't see too many examples of police coming late to actual emergencies. It happens, of course, but the usual complaint is that they don't turn up straight away even at crimes where the perps have long since scarpered, which doesn't seem quite so bad.

    I just worry about the divide that could be caused by things like this - you see those gated communities of the rich in America, imposing wrought iron gates and CCTV cameras everywhere. Secure, maybe, but is it anyone's idea of a good way for society to look?
    Report this comment

  • T Bliar
    Unregistered User
    Nov 12 09 23:04
    Comment: 6316

    I'd strongly recommend that anyone trying this kind of thing check the legality with their "security" folks.

    Where I live, we had a serious problem a year or so ago when some nearby houses were demolished for redevelopment. It got bad enough that we temporarily employed a professional security man with a dog to do high visibility patrols from time to time (the builders refused to do this).

    Our man had to pull out after a while because his legal people (insurers?) said he wasn't insured for patrolling on public property. Now obviously in a "gated community" that's not a problem, but in a general that aspect of the law rather gets in the way, even if it's necessary and helpful to have a visible non-police security presence.
    Report this comment

Post a comment

Registered users log in here

You must be logged in to post. If you have not registered with us, please do so now.

Registration only takes a few minutes. Registered users do not have to complete word verification once logged in and can also take part in competitions and other registered user only features of the site.


Enter the text as shown.

Photosales Search

Time for Me

News from around Berkshire