Friday, 21st November, 2008 RSS Feeds
Add to your Google homepage (requires Google account). Add to My Yahoo! (requires My Yahoo account). Add to My MSN (requires My MSN account). Add to My AOL (requires My AOL account).
Add to Google Add to My Yahoo! (requires My Yahoo account). Add to My MSN (requires My MSN account). Add to My AOL (requires My AOL account).

Published: Monday, 6th October, 2008 12:00

Council imposes ban on charity collectors

By Lucy Crossley

Comment Bubble Comments (3) Printer Print Article

STREET fundraisers have been ordered to stick to designated areas in an agreement between the council and a charity regulator.

Under the pact face-to-face fundraisers who encourage passers-by to donate to charity with a direct debit will only be able to work on the High Street and Charles Square, Bracknell.

They must avoid connecting narrow streets and Stanley Walk so they do not inconvenience shoppers in the town centre and cause a health and safety risk.

Speaking at a meeting of the Bracknell Forest Council licensing and safety committee on Thursday licensing officer Laura Driscoll said: “Stanley Walk is too narrow, if there are people down there collecting direct debits it can clog up the area but if they are in fairly wide locations people can stay clear of them if they want.”

The council is unable to ban face-to-face collectors because although permits are required for money collection a direct debit mandate has no worth at the time of collection. It is similar to collecting a list of names.

But members of the panel expressed their own feelings about the canvassers who many call “chuggers” or charity muggers, because they believe their methods are aggressive or invasive.

Cllr Jacqui Ryder said: “I object to someone jumping out on me, or other defenceless members of the public, and harassing them into signing up to a direct debit.”

Council officers said they would rather allow charity workers in High Street and Charles Square under the voluntary agreement with the Public Fundraising Regulatory Association (PFRA) than have charities ignore a total ban that could not be enforced.

The agreement between the council and the PFRA also says that teams of canvassers should be limited to a maximum of four collectors and a team leader, they are not allowed to cluster in groups and each charity can only visit Bracknell once a week with the streets clear of canvassers for two weeks a year.

It also means that licensing officers and town centre managers only have to deal with one organisation instead of each individual charity separately.

Panel Chairman Marc Brunel-Walker said: “Now we have this association it’s great for us because on matters such as this we have this one body we can go and talk to.”

Mick Aldridge

(Unregistered User)

Oct 6 08 17:37

Our Ref: 680

Use the ref number if you need to report this comment

Dear Lucy - As Chief Executive of the PFRA I feel it is necessary to correct a number of serious errors which appear to have crept into your article headlined "Council imposes ban on charity collectors", and as a result of which anyone merely scanning your first few paragraphs would be seriously mis-led. The Council has "banned" nothing. It has updated and formalised, by mutual consent, the informal agreement whereby face-to-face fundraising has been managed and regulated by the PFRA with the council's consent and to the benefit of all Bracknell's residents and visitors, since at least June 2004. This updating of agreements is an ongoing process which the PFRA is undertaking with all its 80+ local authority partners, of which Bracknell is one of the most long-standing and valued, to bring these arrangements into compliance with the anticipated rules of the Charities Act 2006 when it comes into effect in 2010. This work is supported by the Charity Commission, the Office of the Third (Charity) Sector, and the Association of Town Centre Management, and is of enormous benefit to Bracknell Council is lessening their regulatory load - although no-one would gather that from your article unless they ploughed to the bitter end to read the approving comments of Cllr Brunel-Walker. And all of which you could have discovered had you cared to bother to call us for a comment. Which you now have. I would appreciate a correction and apology in due course.

Report this comment

Tara Knight

(Unregistered User)

Oct 7 08 11:39

Our Ref: 690

Use the ref number if you need to report this comment

I don't think an apology is needed to PFRA at all. I have read the whole article and it makes perfect sense. If someone is mis-led by reading only the first few paragraphs then that's their problem surely?

I found this article informative as to the workings of fundraising in my area. Thanks Lucy!

Report this comment

Mike Smith

(Unregistered User)

Nov 10 08 21:20

Our Ref: 1214

Use the ref number if you need to report this comment

I know Mick Aldridge and PFRA very well and they are a pro F2F fundraising pressure group. In reality this type of intrusive activity is not accepted by many councils around the uk and is very much dispised by the general public. I'm not against charities but my local council has received 'thousands of complaints' about this type of canvacing. People shouldn't be hussled in the streets its just not acceptable, maybe instead just give to the charity on-line and cut out the 'middle man/woman' as they take an enormous cut out of the contributions. Lets not make this type of sales technique acceptable please.

Report this comment

comments Comments

Post a comment

Your Name: * Note this is a Required Field *

Your Email: * Note this is a Required Field *

Your Comment:


Characters Left:

Word verification:

Captcha Image, filename 0456023.jpg

For your convenience, you can now register with our website (which will save you from having to retype your name each time you post a comment). If you would like to do this (or have already!) then please Log in or Register

Local Berkshire Advertisement

Travel Deals

Special Publications